When investigation is beneficial
Investigating the attacking dog
is not essential in most cases. This is because most cases are
against the owner of the dog (not anyone else), and most states say that
a dog owner is strictly liable for dog bite injuries regardless of whether
the dog ever bit anyone previously.
However, the investigation is
necessary if someone has suggested that the victim provoked the
attack, the victim needs to sue another party, such as the landlord,
or if the attack happened in a "one-bite" state. A third of the states
are so-called "one-bite" states, meaning that they require that the
victim prove that the dog bit someone before biting the victim, or exhibited
a dangerous propensity to bite humans.
The history is essential when
an objective is to have the dog removed or destroyed, recover punitive
damages against the dog owner or caretaker of the dog, or criminally
prosecute the dog owner or caretaker.
There are other unusual circumstances
where the history of the dog is important, if not essential, to bringing
a claim for damages. For example, if a claim is going to be litigated,
and the litigation is going to proceed all the way to a trial, the victim's
case is enhanced by proof that the dog either had a history of dangerousness,
or was sick, injured, neglected, untrained, unsocialized, etc. The history
would support the victim's assertion that the bite was unprovoked, and
might also cause the jury to dislike the defendant if he was responsible
for the dog's ill health.
The investigation should be handled
by an attorney or investigator with experience in dog bite litigation.
Blueprint for the investigation
Here is a blueprint for the investigation
of attacking dogs:
People who should be interviewed:
Breeder of the dogs.
Trainer of the dogs (obedience,
agility, protection, service and aggression).
Behaviorist consulted in
connection with the dogs.
Former owners of the dogs.
Mail carriers who deliver
mail to the residence of the dogs, including the supervisors.
UPS deliverymen who pick
up and deliver packages to the residence of the dogs.
Gas company workers who provided
services at the residence of the dogs.
Water company workers who
provided services at the residence of the dogs.
Electrical company workers
who provided services at the residence of the dogs.
Telephone company workers
who provided services at the residence of the dogs.
Heating and plumbing company
workers who provided services at the residence of the dogs.
Gardeners who provided services
at the residence of the dogs and each adjacent residence north, west,
east and south.
Tree trimmers who provided
services at the residence of the dogs and each adjacent residence
north, west, east and south.
Neighbors on each side of
the residence of the dogs, behind the residence (on the next block),
and across the street.
Maid.
Baby sitter.
Pet sitter or dog sitter.
Dog walker.
Kennel where the dogs were
boarded.
Homeowners association. There
may be numerous complaints on record about these dogs.
Police officers, especially
patrol officers.
Private patrol officers,
security guards and employees of security company, including supervisors.
Veterinarian and staff.
Animal hospital and staff.
Animal emergency facility
and staff.
Dog groomer.
Other people who walk dogs
in the same neighborhood or the local park or dog park.
Here are the documents that should
be obtained:
Animal control department
records.
Police department records.
Post office notices that
the dogs (or any of them) are dangerous and mail will not be delivered.
Complaints to homeowners
association.
Complaints to private patrol
company or security company.
Records of veterinarians
and staff.
Lawsuits pertaining to injuries
inflicted by the dogs (or any of them).
Records of action taken to
obtain a court determination, or administrative determination, that
the dogs (or any of them) were dangerous, vicious, or overly aggressive
toward people.
Insurance company communications
pertaining to prior claims against dog owner based on dog-inflicted
injuries.
Kennel records where dogs
(or any of them) were boarded.
Registration with the American
Kennel Club.
Receipts and credit card
statements for payment for food, shelter, toys, cages, veterinary
care, boarding, registration, licensing, training, consultation with
behaviorist.
If at any time any third
party filed a “Petition To Determine If Dog Is Potentially Dangerous
Or Vicious (Menacing Dog),” with respect to the dogs, the following
documents in connection with that proceeding:
a. “Petition
To Determine If Dog Is Potentially Dangerous Or Vicious (Menacing Dog)”
b. “Notice
of Hearing (Menacing Dog)”
c. “Order After
Hearing (Menacing Dog)”
If at any time any third
party filed a lawsuit in which it was alleged that the dogs (or any
of them) injured any person in any manner, whether by biting that
person, negligence, or a dangerous propensity, the following documents
in connection with that lawsuit:
a. Complaint;
b. Each and
every Amended Complaint;
c. Agreement
of settlement, by whatever name it was called;
d. Release
of claims or causes of action;
e. Judgment;
f. Each and
every transcript of testimony given under oath in connection with that
lawsuit.
Each and every written letter,
note, memo or other writing, or copy thereof, in which any party or
third person described or alleged any occurrence of:
a. An injury
to person or property purportedly caused by the dogs;
b. Any purported
behavior or misbehavior of the dogs;
c. The incident
complained of in this lawsuit;
d. Statements
made by the victim or parents of the victim;
e. Statements
made by any defendant;
f. Statements
made by any person claiming to have knowledge about the incident or
any issue in the lawsuit.
Warning! Do not give up!
Do not give up if Animal Control or another source tells you that the
dog never bit anyone before! The dog might be a killer, like the dogs
in the Diane Whipple case. Over 10 people testified at the Grand Jury
that those dogs had attacked them, but nobody ever complained to the police,
animal control or the landlord!
Especially in cases of unprovoked attack, it is very often the case that the attacking dog has previoiusly done something similar. Either the dog has attacked someone before, or has behaved as if it wanted to -- in other words, it exhibited the dangerous propensity to bite, putting the dog owner on notice, and laying the foundation for liability on the part of the owner or keeper.
Assume that the dog that bit in your case
has bitten someone else. Keep looking for that other
victim.

|