Dog Bite Law - Home Page

Dog Bite Law

Veterinary Malpractice
A veterinarian who fails to treat an animal pursuant to the applicable standard of care may be liable for malpractice -- bu that is just half the story.

What is veterinary malpractice?

"Malpractice" is the failure of a professional, such as a vet, to perform services pursuant to the "standard of care." The "standard of care" is what other professionals, similarly situated (geographically and within the same field of specialization), would do under the same circumstances. For example, if you brought your dog to a vet, and your dog had been bitten by another animal, and the standard of care called for the vet to give your dog a certain vaccination, and the dog later became ill or died as a result of the failure of the vet to give the shot, then the vet would be liable for all resulting losses and damages.

Elements of malpractice

Here is what has to be proved:
  • The dog had a certain condition. 
  • The standard of care was for the vet to take a certain action, i.e., give a certain vaccination.
  • The vet did not take the action required by the standard of care.
  • The dog became ill or died as a result of the vet's failure to take the required action.

Proof of malpractice

It is very difficult and can be very expensive to prove the second and fourth elements above.

The second element requires that the dog owner prove the standard of care. Proof of the standard of care must come from an admissible source of evidence. 

  • In a small claims case (i.e., a case involving less than $5,000.00 in losses and damages), proof may be by way of authoritative textbook, authoritative veterinary literature, or better yet, by a declaration or letter from another vet. 
  • The vet's letter or declaration would have to establish these points: he or she is a vet, practices veterinary medicine in the same general geographic area as the defendant, has reviewed the defendant vet's chart for the owner's dog; and that there is a standard of care applicable to the dog's condition, the testifying vet is familiar with that standard of care, the standard of care required that the defendant vet do the following things, the defendant's chart reveals a complete absence of those things, if the standard of care had been followed then the dog would not have gotten ill or died, and therefore the defendant committed veterinary malpractice.
It is difficult to get a professional to testify against another professional. This is caused by human nature. It is true of doctors, lawyers, police officers, and every other profession on the face of the Earth. Victims have a difficult time proving malpractice cases because of this factor.

The other problem is the fourth element described above. The victim must prove that the dog would not have gotten ill or died if the standard of care have been followed. This is very difficult because of the inherent risks of any veterinary procedure. For example, many drugs come with warnings that they might not work, and that a certain percentage of the animals who take that drug will die from it. The flea medication I gave my rabbits came with that warning. 

So the vet can say that, even if the shot were given, it might not have worked, and in fact it might have killed the dog sooner.

The cause of death requires an autopsy and a written opinion by a pathologist establishing the cause. An accurate pathology report always states that the primary cause of death was failure of the heart to pump, even if the victim is electrocuted. The secondary factors are then listed, such as problems with kidneys or liver. You have to get a pathologist to testify that all of the secondary factors are consistent with only one interpretation, namely the condition that resulted from the failure of the vet to perform up to the standard of care.

Practical advice

Complicated. Difficult. Expensive to prove. That's not the worse part. The dog owner most certainly needs legal advice -- in fact, needs legal representation. However, the losses and damages are not that great in terms of possible maximum recovery. 

In some states, there is law that a dog is simply another piece of  property, like a table or chair, thereby limiting the maximum judgment to the cost of further treatment, or the market value of the dog.

The point is that, after looking at the costs of getting these expert opinions, plus the cost of the attorney, the dog owner usually has to conclude that there is nothing that can be done except to politely ask the defendant vet to pay up, or go to small claims court with whatever you have and make the most forcible presentation you possibly can.

Return to top of page

Litigation forms and other materials for attorneys

Just about all the documents a plaintiff's attorney will need, for less than the cost of typing them. Complaint, interrogatories, document production requests, admissions, witness list, petition for approval of minor's compromise (structured settlement), order approving minor's compromise, and Kenneth Phillips' 50-page deposition outline that covers every issue that can arise in a dog bite case. Save hours of work with the Dog Bite Litigation Forms for Plaintiffs' Lawyers. Good throughout the USA. Available just one minute after you purchase them at the Dog Bite Law Bookstore. Download and use today.

Photo of DVD, "Anatomy of a Dog Bite Case."

Anatomy of a Dog Bite Case is Mr. Phillips' 2-1/2 hour video seminar for plaintiffs' lawyers, containing tips and tricks, practice pointers and winning strategies that cannot be found anywhere else. A highly rated legal best-seller. Covers case selection, establishing liability, dealing with defenses, settlement and litigation throughout the USA. Arrives by mail in less than a week.

Return to top of page


www.dogbitelaw.com and each of its sections and products, including Dog Bite Law, The Dog Bite Law Adviser, Dog Bite Litigation Forms, What To Do If Your Dog Is Injured Or Killed, Avoiding Liability When You Train, Shelter or Adopt-Out, Anatomy of a Dog Bite Case, and the foregoing text, are (c) 1999-2009 Kenneth M. Phillips. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or part prohibited except where advance permission is granted in writing. Please read the disclaimer and our rules for linking and quoting. Reporters seeking interviews are welcome to contact us by clicking here.
This page last changed on 7/29/08