|
|
|
||||||||
What is veterinary malpractice?"Malpractice" is the failure of a professional, such as a vet, to perform services pursuant to the "standard of care." The "standard of care" is what other professionals, similarly situated (geographically and within the same field of specialization), would do under the same circumstances. For example, if you brought your dog to a vet, and your dog had been bitten by another animal, and the standard of care called for the vet to give your dog a certain vaccination, and the dog later became ill or died as a result of the failure of the vet to give the shot, then the vet would be liable for all resulting losses and damages. Elements of malpracticeHere is what has to be proved:
Proof of malpracticeIt is very difficult and can be very expensive to prove the second and fourth elements above.The second element requires that the dog owner prove the standard of care. Proof of the standard of care must come from an admissible source of evidence.
The other problem is the fourth element described above. The victim must prove that the dog would not have gotten ill or died if the standard of care have been followed. This is very difficult because of the inherent risks of any veterinary procedure. For example, many drugs come with warnings that they might not work, and that a certain percentage of the animals who take that drug will die from it. The flea medication I gave my rabbits came with that warning. So the vet can say that, even if the shot were given, it might not have worked, and in fact it might have killed the dog sooner. The cause of death requires an autopsy and a written opinion by a pathologist establishing the cause. An accurate pathology report always states that the primary cause of death was failure of the heart to pump, even if the victim is electrocuted. The secondary factors are then listed, such as problems with kidneys or liver. You have to get a pathologist to testify that all of the secondary factors are consistent with only one interpretation, namely the condition that resulted from the failure of the vet to perform up to the standard of care. Practical adviceComplicated. Difficult. Expensive to prove. That's not the worse part. The dog owner most certainly needs legal advice -- in fact, needs legal representation. However, the losses and damages are not that great in terms of possible maximum recovery.In some states, there is law that a dog is simply another piece of property, like a table or chair, thereby limiting the maximum judgment to the cost of further treatment, or the market value of the dog. The point is that, after looking at the costs of getting these expert opinions, plus the cost of the attorney, the dog owner usually has to conclude that there is nothing that can be done except to politely ask the defendant vet to pay up, or go to small claims court with whatever you have and make the most forcible presentation you possibly can. Litigation forms and other materials for attorneys
|
www.dogbitelaw.com and each of its sections and products, including Dog Bite Law, The Dog Bite Law Adviser, Dog Bite Litigation Forms, What To Do If Your Dog Is Injured Or Killed, Avoiding Liability When You Train, Shelter or Adopt-Out, Anatomy of a Dog Bite Case, and the foregoing text, are (c) 1999-2009 Kenneth M. Phillips. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or part prohibited except where advance permission is granted in writing. Please read the disclaimer and our rules for linking and quoting. Reporters seeking interviews are welcome to contact us by clicking here. |