Solutions for victims, lawyers, canine professionals and dog owners

Dog Bite Law Blog

"Ban the Breed" - Michigan Newspaper Editorial On Pit Bulls and Other Dangerous Dogs

“Ban the breed. And aggressively prosecute the owner of any vicious dog, of any type.” The Bay City Times says that not only pit bulls but other dangerous dogs need to be eliminated, because of the horrible injuries and deaths they inflict regularly. (Click here to read the article.)

This year’s death count can be found on the home page of Dog Bite Law (dogbitelaw.com), and details about canine homicides for the past several years are at Dangerous and Vicious Dogs.

Before jumping on the bandwagon of this or any other solution to the dog bite problem, read Preventing Dog Bites. I and many other experts feel that, rather than banning any breed, the most rational and politically “do-able” approach would be to pass laws that would keep certain high-risk breeds away from the wrong people, places and situations.

The Bay City Times is a daily newspaper published in Bay City, Michigan, United States. The paper has a circulation of 33,000 daily and 42,000 Sunday editions, and is the most widely-circulated newspaper in northeastern Michigan. The newspaper began in 1873 and remains one of the oldest newspapers still in circulation.

Texas Dog Owner Indicted After His Dogs Seriously Maul A Person

Brian O’Neal McDonald, 29, of Chappell Hill, Texas, has been indicted for animal attack causing serious bodily injury, a third degree felony. On January 10, 2009, William Whiddon Jr., 49, was mauled by McDonald’s dogs, which included a German shepherd, a pit bull and one dog of an unknown breed. (To read more, click here.)

Texas has some of the most severe criminal laws against dog owners whose dogs injure people. (See Texas.) Despite its readiness to punish dog owners, however, the state adheres to the ancient one bite rule, which makes it difficult for innocent dog bite victims to make necessary insurance claims.

California Man Mauled By Pack Of Dogs Has Died - USA Fatality #14 For 2009

On March 28, 2009, 48-year-old Gordon Lykins of Winterhaven, Calif. was attacked by dogs near a drainage canal road a few miles north of Yuma, Arizona. He died on April 10, 2009, from those injuries. (To read the article, click here.)

It is believed that up to 11 dogs were involved in this attack. The dogs, of mixed breeds, apparently were loose at the time of the attack. However, the details of the attack are not sufficiently provable at this time, because Lykins was kept under sedation while being treated. Therefore the police are searching for witnesses to the mauling.

This is another unusual death. Nevertheless, one factor from the Dog Attack Danger Scale apparently was present here: the pack mentality. Three dogs are worse than 2, 4 are worse than 3, etc. Docile dogs often become uncharacteristically violent and vicious when they are in a pack. In 2008, 39% of the fatalities involved multiple dogs.

Michigan Man Killed By Dogs - USA Fatality #13 In 2009

David B. Whiteneck Jr., 41, of Huron County, Michigan, was killed by a number of dogs belonging to his elderly, absent landlord. The date of death has not been determined, but the body was found on April 13, 2009. The dogs were Australian shepherds mixed with blue heeler. This is the 13th USA fatality by dogs in 2009.

Two factors on the Dog Attack Danger Scale were present here:

  • A dog in its own yard, and no master present. In 2008, 78% of the human fatalities were by dogs in their own yard.
  • The pack mentality. Three dogs are worse than 2, 4 are worse than 3, etc. Docile dogs often become uncharacteristically violent and vicious when they are in a pack. In 2008, 39% of the fatalities involved multiple dogs.

To learn more, see the Dog Attack Danger Scale. Michigan is a strict liability state.

Babysitter in dog mauling case charged with felony child neglect

Seventeen-year-old Kayla Diane Nowlin of Panama City, Florida, was arrested this week on a charge of child neglect causing great bodily harm. She was babysitting a 2-year-old child which was mauled by her boxer. The teenager put the toddler on the ground, walked away, and when she turned around she saw the dog savagely attacking the child. She did this with full awareness that her dog previously had bitten another child in the neighborhood. (Read the article.)

Neighbor's Dogs Get Loose, Kill Child Playing In His Own Back Yard - USA Fatality #12 for 2009

On April 10, 2009, Michael Landry, a 4-year-old boy, was attacked by a neighbor's three boxers. The child was in the back yard of his parents' home in Louisiana. He later died of his injuries.

Police stated that a man "acting as caretaker" for one or more of the dogs was cleaning out the dogs' kennel at the time of the attack. The dogs went into the Landry back yard and savaged the young child. (Click here to read more.)

Only one of the six factors on the Dog Attack Danger Scale was present here: the pack mentality. Three dogs are worse than 2, 4 are worse than 3, etc. Docile dogs often become uncharacteristically violent and vicious when they are in a pack. In 2008, 39% of the fatalities involved multiple dogs.

11 USA Fatalities For 2009

The death count for the USA has reached 11 as of this date. Details about them can be found here at the Dog Bite Victim Log in addition to the home page of Dog Bite Law and the section of Dog Bite Law entitled Dangerous and Vicious Dogs.

Dog Bite Victims Usually Are Not Compensated For Injuries

No matter what the law says, dog bite victims usually do not receive the compensation provided by law. Consider this: despite the fact that over 1,000 dog bite victims per day are treated in USA emergency rooms, the insurance industry pays only 65 dog bite claims per day. That means less than 7 of 100 dog bite victims can count on being compensated. Does this sound fair to you?

CAUTION: Animal Control Officers Mislead Dog Bite Victims

Many of the dangerous dog laws currently in effect in our cities and counties need provisions that will protect the privacy and rights of dog bite victims.

Victims of dog bites have had their privacy violated when their personal medical files have been handed to dog owners without any limitations as to what they could see or how they could use the information. I have personally been threatened by animal control officers who did not want me to even ask questions at dangerous dog hearings. In the message I received, below, the victim relates how the animal control officer induced her to inadvertently waive her right to compensation. 

The dog in my attack had a record. Here is the "deal" I made with AC about my attack. It involved dropping criminal charges -- this "DEAL" was presented to me just after I left my 2-day hospital stay and had not yet acquired an attorney -- in exchange for getting the dog owner to put the dog down. Only much later do I learn that "dropping criminal charges" eliminated my chances of being eligible for the WA Felony Victim Fund.

I do NOT know if my attack would have qualified for a felony in my state. My injury did qualify as "severe" under state law because my arm was broken. I never followed this up because I was too angry, and I am still too angry.

How many victims are being offered this "deal" while lying in a hospital room without an attorney present? This is what makes me angry.

dogbitelaw-litigation-forms

What people write to Attorney Phillips...

Facebook Dog Bite LawTwitter Dog Bite Law